PENGARUH KOLABORASI PROBLEM BASED-LEARNING DAN MIND MAPPNG, MOTIVASI BERPRESTASI TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR EKONOMI

Authors

  • Ihsan Ihsan Program Studi Pendidikan Ekonomi, FKIP Universitas Nahdlatul Wathan Mataram
  • Baiq Salkiah Program Studi Pendidikan Ekonomi, FKIP Universitas Nahdlatul Wathan Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33578/mbi.v17i1.90

Keywords:

kolaborasi PBL dan mind mapping, motivasi berprestasi, hasil belajar ekonomi.

Abstract

This research is a quantitative quasi experimental non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design. The technique data analysis used analysis of variance 2 × 2 factorial design (two-way ANOVA) and t test. The results showed that, (1) there is a significant difference in economic learning outcomes between groups of students who study with a collaborative problem-based learning and mind mapping model with a group of students who study using a conventional model, (2) There is a significant difference in economic learning outcomes between groups of students who have high achievement motivation and groups of students who have low achievement motivation. (3) At the level of high motivation there is a significant difference in economic learning outcomes between groups of students who study with a collaborative problem-based learning and mind mapping model is better than the group of students who study with a conventional model, (4)At the level of low motivation there is a significant difference in economic learning outcomes between groups of students who study with a collaborative problem-based learning and mind mapping model is better than the group of students who study with a conventional model, (5) There is a significant interaction effect between the problem-based learning and mind mapping collaborative learning model, achievement motivation on student economic learning outcomes

References

Akcay, Behiye. 2009. Problembased Learning in Science Education. Journal of Turkish Science Education. Vol. 6 (1), 26-36.

Alder, R.W. & Milne, M.J. 1997. Improping The Quality of Accounting Studen’s Learning Through Action-Oriented Learning Task. Accounting Education. Vol. 6, No. 3: 191-215.

Ani, Chatarina T. 2004. Psikologi Belajar. Semarang: UPT MKK UNNES.

Anderson, L.W. & Krathwolh, D.K. (Eds.). 2010. Kerangka Landasan Untuk Pembelajaran, pengajaran, dan Asesmen (Revisi Taksonomi Pendidikan Bloom). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Buzan, T. 2009. Buku Pintar Mind Map. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Campbell, D.T. & Stanley, J.C. 1996. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Design for Research. Chicago: Rend McNallys.

Cohen, L. 1976. Educational Research in Clasroom and Schools: A Manual of Material and Methods. San Francisco: Harper & Row Publisher

Cozby, Paul C. 2009. Methods in Behavioral Research. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Creswell, John W. 2010. Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Degeng, I.N.S. 1991. Karakristik Belajar Mahasiswa Berbagai Perguruan Tinggi di Indonesia. Jakarta PAU-UT Dirjen Dikti Depdikbud.

Degeng, I.N.S. 1997. Strategi Pembelajaran Mengorganisasi Isi dengan Model Elaborasi. Jakarta: Biro Penerbitan Ikatan Profesi Teknologi Pendidikan Indonesia. Malang: IKIP Malang.

DePorter, B. & Hernacki, M. 2000. Quantum Learning. Bandung: Kaifa.

Dick W. & Carey, L. 1985. The Sistematic Design of Instruction.. Glenview. Illionis: Scot Foresman and Company.

Eggen, P. & Kauchak, D. 2012. Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Indeks.

Jonassen, D.H. & Hung, W. 2008. All Problems are not Equal: Implications for Problembased Learning. The interdisciplinary Journal of Problembased Learning. 2 (2). 6-28.

Kerlinger, F.N. 2003. Fundation Behavior Research. (Terjamahan oleh Simatupang, L.R. & Koesoemanto, H.J.). Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.

Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. (2006). Project-Based Learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of The Learning Sciences (pp. 317–334). New York: Cambridge

Moore, D.K. 2005. Effective Instructional Strategies From Theory and Practice. London: Sage Publication.

Nursamsu. 2013. Efektifitas Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kolaborasi Problembased Learning (PBL) dan Jigsaw terhadap Hasil Belajar Ditinjau dari Motivasi. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Malang: PPs UM.

Sari, Nur F. & Nasikh. 2009. Efektivitas Penerapan Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dan Peta Konsep dalam Meningkatkan Proses dan Hasil Belajar Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Siswa Kelas X6 SMAN 2 Malang Semester Genap Tahun Ajaran 2006-2007. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Malang (JPE UM), (Online), 2(2), (http://www.feum.com), diakses 14 Agustus 2019.

Savery, J.R. 2006. Overview of Problem-Based Learning: Definitions and Distinction. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning. Volume 1 (spiring): 9-18.

Sigler, E.A. & Saam, J. 2007. Constructivist or Expository Instuctional Approaches; Does Instruction Have an Effect on the Accuracy of Judgmen of Learning (JOL)?. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 7, No. 2, October 2007, pp. 22-31. Diakses dari www. Doaj.org. tanggal 20 Mei 2019.

Slameto. 2003. Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta Rineka cipta.

Sudjana, N. 2006. Strategi Belajar Aktif. Bandung:Sinar Baru.

Sugiyono, 2010. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sujarwo. 2011. Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dan Ekspositori Terhadap Hasil Belajar Sosiologi pada Siswa Yang Memiliki Tingkat Motivasi Berprestasi Dan Kreativitas Berbeda. Disertasi tidak diterbitkan. Malang: PPs UM.

Uno, Hamzah B. 2008. Model Pembelajaran: Menciptakan Proses Belajar Mengajar yang Kreatif dan Efektif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Uno, Hamzah B., Ninam, L., & Satria, K. 2010. Desain Pembelajaran. Bandung: MQS Publishing.

Uno, Hamzah B. 2011. Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Wheeler, S., Kelly, P., & Gale, K. 2005. The Influence of Online Problem-Based Learning on Teacher’s Profesional Practice and Identity. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology. 13 (2): 125-137.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-10

Issue

Section

Articles