PREDICTION OF CRIME VIRALITY BY INDONESIA NATIONAL POLICE ON SOCIAL MEDIA

Authors

  • Yudhi Prasongko Computer Science Department, BINUS Graduate Program, Master of Computer Science Bina Nusantara University Jakarta
  • Abba Suganda Girsang Computer Science Department, BINUS Graduate Program, Master of Computer Science Bina Nusantara University Jakarta
  • Andry Yayogi Computer Science Department, BINUS Graduate Program, Master of Computer Science Bina Nusantara University Jakarta
  • Deny Prasetyo Computer Science Department, BINUS Graduate Program, Master of Computer Science Bina Nusantara University Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33758/mbi.v17i11.388

Abstract

Twitter is the most generally involved online entertainment stage for sharing data. Furthermore, Twitter is quite possibly of the biggest social medium in Indonesia. The vast majority of the data or news that is distributed comes from issues or occasions that are creating in the public eye. The issue of police officers committing crimes is one that quickly becomes viral. This examination is a continuation of past exploration to foresee virality in view of Twitter information. Predicting and classifying text in the form of tweets and posts (socmed Twitter) using BERT. IndoBERT as a safeguarded model in the characterization of kinds of wrongdoing. ViralBERT to foresee tweet virality utilizing text includes and adding numeric highlights to enhance virality forecasts. Using the baseline from this study, the data set was used to train ViralBert and validate model results. The dataset was gathered utilizing the Twitter Programming interface with the watchwords 'oknum polisi' and oknum polri'. The consequences of this virality expectation will be utilized as a kind of perspective by the police in following up a case that is viral locally

References

W. Stassen, “Your news in 140 characters: exploring the role of social media in journalism,” Glob. Media J. African Ed., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 116–131, 2011, doi: 10.5789/4-1-15.

M. T. Borges-Tiago, F. Tiago, and C. Cosme, “Exploring users’ motivations to participate in viral communication on social media,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 101, no. August, pp. 574–582, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.011.

M. Afroz, “Rise of Violence against Minorities, Fragile governance or Structured Marginalization?,” Res. Rev. Int. J. Multidiscip., vol. 4, no. 1, 2019, [Online]. Available: www.rrjournals.com

V. Ivanyuk, “Forecasting of digital financial crimes in Russia based on machine learning methods,” J. Comput. Virol. Hacking Tech., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11416-023-00480-3.

I. N. Lymperopoulos, “RC-Tweet: Modeling and predicting the popularity of tweets through the dynamics of a capacitor,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 163, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113785.

A. K. Thakur et al., “Multimodal and Explainable Internet Meme Classification,” arXiv, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 23–32, 2022, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.05612

A. Al-Hashedi et al., “Ensemble Classifiers for Arabic Sentiment Analysis of Social Network (Twitter Data) towards COVID-19-Related Conspiracy Theories,” Appl. Comput. Intell. Soft Comput., vol. 2022, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/6614730.

R. Kora and A. Mohammed, “An enhanced approach for sentiment analysis based on meta-ensemble deep learning,” Soc. Netw. Anal. Min., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 37–52, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s13278-023-01043-6.

T. Elmas, S. Stephane, and C. Houssiaux, Measuring and Detecting Virality on Social Media: The Case of Twitter’s Viral Tweets Topic, vol. 1, no. 1. Association for Computing Machinery, 2023. doi: 10.1145/3543873.3587373.

M. Benson, “Predicting Virality of Online News Articles using Textual Content,” EECS, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2020.

E. Cesario, P. Lindia, and A. Vinci, “Detecting Multi-Density Urban Hotspots in a Smart City: Approaches, Challenges and Applications,” Big Data Cogn. Comput., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2023, doi: 10.3390/bdcc7010029.

D. Darwish, Big Data Issues. Egypt: Ahram Canadian University, 2023. doi: 10.4018/978-1-6684-7366-5.ch020.

D. Q. Nguyen, T. Vu, and A. Tuan Nguyen, “BERTweet: A pre-trained language model for English Tweets,” in Proceedings of the 2020 EMNLP (Systems Demonstrations), 2020, pp. 9–14. doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.2.

J. Devlin, M. W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,” NAACL HLT 2019 - 2019 Conf. North Am. Chapter Assoc. Comput. Linguist. Hum. Lang. Technol. - Proc. Conf., vol. 1, no. Mlm, pp. 4171–4186, 2019.

M. I. Sinapoy, K. Sibaroni, Y. Prasetyowati, and S. Suryani, “Comparison of LSTM and IndoBERT Method,” J. RESTI, vol. 5, no. 158, pp. 2–6, 2023.

B. Juarto and Yulianto, “Indonesian News Classification Using IndoBert,” Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl. Eng., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 454–460, 2023.

J. Mutinda, W. Mwangi, and G. Okeyo, “Sentiment Analysis of Text Reviews Using Lexicon-Enhanced Bert Embedding (LeBERT) Model with Convolutional Neural Network,” Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13031445.

Sepúlveda-Torres et al., “Leveraging relevant summarized information and multi-layer classification to generalize the detection of misleading headlines,” Data Knowl. Eng., vol. 145, no. December 2022, p. 102176, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.datak.2023.102176.

L. Huang, C. Sun, X. Qiu, and X. Huang, “Glossbert: BERT for word sense disambiguation with gloss knowledge,” in EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019 - 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference, 2019, pp. 3509–3514. doi: 10.18653/v1/d19-1355.

J. Pfeffer et al., “Just Another Day on Twitter: A Complete 24 Hours of Twitter Data,” in Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 2023, vol. 17, no. Icwsm, pp. 1073–1081. doi: 10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22215.

S. Bengesi, T. Oladunni, R. Olusegun, and H. Audu, “A Machine Learning-Sentiment Analysis on Monkeypox Outbreak: An Extensive Dataset to Show the Polarity of Public Opinion From Twitter Tweets,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, no. January, pp. 11811–11826, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3242290.

E. Chen and E. Ferrara, “Tweets in Time of Conflict: A Public Dataset Tracking the Twitter Discourse on the War between Ukraine and Russia,” Proc. Int. AAAI Conf. Web Soc. Media, vol. 17, no. ICWSM, pp. 1006–1013, 2023, doi: 10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22208.

L. Hong, O. Dan, and B. D. Davison, “Predicting popular messages in Twitter,” Proc. 20th Int. Conf. Companion World Wide Web, WWW 2011, pp. 57–58, 2011, doi: 10.1145/1963192.1963222.

Z. Ma, A. Sun, and G. Cong, “On Predicting the Popularity of Newly Emerging Hashtags in Twitter,” J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., vol. 64, no. July, pp. 1852–1863, 2013, doi: 10.1002/asi.

P. Nesi, G. Pantaleo, I. Paoli, and I. Zaza, “Assessing the reTweet proneness of tweets: predictive models for retweeting,” Multimed. Tools Appl., vol. 77, no. 20, pp. 26371–26396, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11042-018-5865-0.

S. Sharma and V. Gupta, “Role of twitter user profile features in retweet prediction for big data streams,” Multimed. Tools Appl., vol. 81, no. 19, pp. 27309–27338, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11042-022-12815-1.

M. Zhou et al., “Interactive Segmentation as Gaussian Process Classification,” Comput. Vis. Found., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 19488–19497, 2023, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.14578

R. Van Der Goot, “Effectiveness of Intermediate Training on an Uncurated Collection of,” in Proceedings of the The 17th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2023), 2023, pp. 230–245.

A. Pegoraro, K. Kumari, H. Fereidooni, and A.-R. Sadeghi, “To ChatGPT, or not to ChatGPT: That is the question!,” arXiv, vol. 2, no. April, pp. 1–6, 2023, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.01487

M. Grandini, E. Bagli, and G. Visani, “Metrics for Multi-Class Classification: an Overview,” A WHITE Pap., vol. 14, no. August, pp. 1–17, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.05756

Downloads

Published

2023-06-29

Issue

Section

Articles