FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI OPINI AUDIT GOING CONCERN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33578/mbi.v17i8.330Keywords:
Going Concern Opinion, Profitability, Liquidity, Solvability, Audit Quality, The Prior Audit OpinionAbstract
The loss of public confidence in the company’s image and the company’s management due to the substantial doubt about the company’s ability to survive, so the auditor’s responsibility to give an opinion of whether the company can maintain its viability by providing going concern opinion. This research aims to investigate the factors that have the influence on the probability of issuing a going concern opinion. The variables used are profitability, liquidity, solvability, audit quality and the prior audit opinion. The research data obtained from the financial statements of the manufacturing companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2018 – 2021 and analyzed by binary logistic regression analysis method with program SPSS 26.0. The research result found that profitability, solvability and the prior audit opinion significantly influence the probability of having a going concern opinion from the auditor. It can be concluded that a company will not have a going concern problem if it has a good profitability and (though) low solvency. In addition, an auditor as an independent party should be reliable in providing opinions related to the issue of going concern. In addition, an auditor as an independent party should be reliable in providing opinions related to the issue of going concern.
References
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (1988). The Auditor's Consideration of an Entity's Ability to Continue in Existence. Statement on Auditing Standards No. 59. New York: AICPA.
Amilin dan Ady Irawan (2008), Analisis Penilaian Going Concern Perusahaan dan Opini Audit oleh KAP Big Four dengan KAP Non Big Four (Studi pada Emiten di Bursa Efek Indonesia), Jurnal Ekonomi Vol. XVIII, No. 2, hal 72-83.
Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., and Beasley, M. S. (2008). Auditing and Assurance Services an Integrated Ahalroach. New Jersey: Person Education.
Barnes, P., and Huan, H. D. (1993). The Auditor's Going Concern Decision: Some UK Evidence Concerning Independence and Competence. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 20(2), hal 213-228.
Behn, B. K., Kaplan, S. E., and Krumwiede, K. R. (2001). Further Evidence on the Auditor's Going-Concern Report: The Influence of Management Plans. Auditing: A Journal Of Practice and Theory, 20(1), hal 13-28.
Cahyono, D. (2014). Audit Opinion, Audit Quality, And Factors of Its Audit Opinion Going Concern. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(24), hal 70-77.
Chen, K. C., and Church, B. K. (1992). Default on Debt Obligations and the Issuance of Going-Concern Opinions. Auditing, 11(2), 30.
Clarkson, P. M., and Simunic, D. A. (1994). The Association Between Audit Quality, Retained Ownership, and Firm-Specific Risk in US vs Canadian IPO Markets. Journal of Accounting And Economics, 17(1), hal 207-228.
Craswell, A. T., Francis, J. R., and Taylor, S. L. (1995). Auditor Brand Name Reputations and Industry Specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(3), hal 297-322.
Fogel-Yaari, H., and Zhang, P. (2013). Is an Auditors’ Propensity to Issue Going Concern Opinions Related to Audit Quality?. In CAAA Annual Conference.
Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Hani, Clearly, and Mukhlasin. (2003). Going-Concern dan Opini Audit: Suatu Studi pada Perusahaan Perbankan di BEJ. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi VI.
IAPI. (2013). Standar Audit (SA) 570 Kelangsungan Usaha. Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia.
Januarti, I., and Fitrianasari, E. (2008). Analisis Rasio Keuangan dan Rasio Non-Keuangan yang Mempengaruhi Auditor dalam Memberikan Opini Audit Going Concern pada Auditee (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di BEJ Tahun 2000-2005). Jurnal Maksi, 8(1), hal 43-58.
Januarti, I. (2009). Analisis Pengaruh Faktor Perusahaan, Kualitas Auditor, Kepemilikan Perusahaan terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern (Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia). SIAE (System Informasi, Auditing, Etika Profesi).
Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), hal 305-360.
Junaidi, and Hartono, J. (2010). Faktor Non-Keuangan Pada Opini Going Concern. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIII.
Khaddafi, M. (2015). Effect of Debt Default, Audit Quality and Acceptance of Audit Opinion Going Concern in Manufacturing Company in Indonesia Stock Exchange. European Journal Of Business And Innovation Research, 3(3), hal 34-51.
Kieso, D. E., Weygandt, J. J., and Warfield, T. W. (2011). Financial Accounting IFRS Edition. New York: John Willey and Sons.
Kurnia, P., & Mella, N. F. (2018). Opini Audit Going Concern : Kajian Berdasarkan Kualitas Audit , Kondisi Keuangan , Audit Tenure, Ukuran Perusahaan , Pertumbuhan Perusahaan dan Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya pada Perusahaan yang Mengalami Financial Distress pada Perusahaan Manufaktur. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 6(1), hal 105–122.
Masyitoh, Oni Currie and Desi Adhariani. 2010. The Analysis of Determinants of Going concern Audit Report. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing.Vol.6, No.4, hal 26-37.
Mckeown, J. C., Mutchler, J. F., and Hopwood, W. (1991). Towards an Explanation of Auditor Failure to Modify the Audit Opinions of Bankrupt Companies. Auditing-A Journal of Practice and Theory, 10, hal 1-13.
Mutchler, J. F. (1984). Auditors’ Perceptions of the Going-Concern Opinion Decision. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 3(2), hal 17-30.
Mutchler, J. F. (1985). A Multivariate Analysis of the Auditor's Going-Concern Opinion Decision. Journal of Accounting Research, hal 668-682.
Mutchler, J. F., Hopwood, W., and Mckeown, J. M. (1997). The Influence of Contrary Information and Mitigating Factors on Audit Opinion Decisions on Bankrupt Companies. Journal of Accounting Research, 35(2), hal 295-310.
Myers, S. C. (1977). Determinants of Corporate Borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), hal 147-175.
Nogler, G. E. (1995). The Resolution of Auditor Going Concern Opinions. Auditing, 14(2), 54.
Petronela, T. (2004). Pertimbangan Going Concern Perusahaan dalam Pemberian Opini Audit. Jurnal Balance, hal 46-55.
Praptitorini, M. D., and Januarti, I. (2007). Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas Audit, Debt Default dan Opinion Shohaling terhadap Penerimaan Opini Going Concern. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X, hal 1-25.
Reynolds, J. and Francis, J. R. (2000). Does Size Matter? The Influence of Large Clients on Office-Level Auditor Reporting Decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(3), hal 375–400.
Setyarno, E. B., and Januarti, I. (2006). Pengaruh Kualitas Audit, Kondisi Keuangan Perusahaan, Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya, Pertumbuhan Perusahaan terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi IX, hal 1-25.
Sherlita, E., and Puspita, E. T. (2012). The Effect of Financial Ratios, Prior Audit Opinion, and Growth on the Auditors' Going Concern Opinion. The 13th Malaysia-Indonesia International Conference on Economics, Management and Accounting (MIICEMA) 2012, Faculty of Economics Sriwijaya University.
Solikhah, B., and Kiswanto. (2010). Pengaruh Kondisi Keuangan, Pertumbuhan dan Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 2(1).
Sudarmadji, A. M., and Sularto, L. (2007). Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Profitabilitas, Leverage, dan Tipe Kepemilikan Perusahaan Terhadap Luas Voluntary Disclosure Laporan Keuangan Tahunan. Proceeding PESAT (Psikologi, Ekonomi, Sastra, Arsitek and Sipil), 2, hal 53-61
Susanto, Yulius K. (2009). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern pada Perusahaan Publik Sektor Manufaktur. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 11(3), hal 155-173.
Venuti, E. K. (2004). The Going-Concern Assumption Revisited: Assessing a Company's Future Viability. The CPA Journal, 74(5), 40.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Brillianty Theodorus, Jamaludin Iskak

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.